Review extracted information
Inspect extracted terms beside the relevant contract language, confidence, and document context.
Verification Workspace
Make every finding Make every findingreviewable.
krtiq brings forward the terms, conflicts, and missing references that deserve human attention, with the source material close enough to verify before you act.
A distinct krtiq workflow
Built for the question: can we rely on this finding, and what should happen next?
What it helps you do
Built for a clearer next decision.
Resolve exceptions
Work through conflicting terms, missing references, and relationship gaps without losing the history behind them.
Keep an evidence trail
Approve, correct, or flag findings while preserving the reasoning and source that informed the decision.
Exceptions
Only the questions that need judgement.
The decisions queue holds the findings a person has to settle, each with the document it came from, why it was raised, and what confirming it will change.
- Straightforward extraction never reaches the queue.
- Each question names the document behind it.
- The effect of an answer is stated before you give it.
- Answers are kept, with their reasoning, for the next person.
Evidence
Open the clause behind any value.
Every extracted value keeps the clause, document and page that produced it, so a term can be checked against the contract instead of trusted.
- Source language sits beside the structured value.
- Page and section are recorded, not approximated.
- Confidence is shown rather than implied.
- The trail survives re-processing.
How it works
From contract files to useful context.
01See what needs reviewA focused queue separates straightforward extraction from exceptions that need judgement.
02Check the sourceOpen the supporting clause, document, and relationship context before approving a conclusion.
03Leave a usable recordCorrections and decisions remain tied to the agreement for the next person who needs context.
Verify what needs judgementkrtiq
FindingLiability capConfidence: 74%
ExceptionConflicting term2 documents involved
EvidenceSection 8.2Open source clause
Questions krtiq can help answer
01Which terms need verification?
02Why did this finding get flagged?
03What source supports this current term?
In more detail
Which terms need verification?
krtiq separates straightforward extraction from findings that need judgement - low confidence, conflicting values, or unresolved references - and queues only the second group for a person.
Why did this finding get flagged?
Each finding carries the reason it surfaced, its confidence, and the documents involved, with the supporting clause one click away.
What source supports this current term?
Every extracted value keeps the clause, document, and location that produced it, so the answer is the source text rather than a summary of it.
Part of the krtiq platform